Scientist can’t prove it yet, but it’s real
The world is governed, by a set of natural laws. For
example, the notion that gravity holds our feet on the planet is a
simplification of the laws of gravity. Another such law states that all
life-forms on earth are carbon based. The world of science is based on these
and many other assumptions, and much progress has been made because we know and
live by these laws.
If we were to open up a new dimension by proving life after death (existence of another
life to live in another world after death on earth), it would revolutionize
science by introducing other dimensions to study scientifically than the ones
we know.
For Instance, if it were proved that a person could leave
his body and travel through walls just by thinking. It would change the way
science thinks about communication and travel. Not to mention the properties of
life.
It would prove a whole universe, one that is certainly more
developed than the one we now live in. T he implications of such a find almost
defy description. Can you imagine penetrating another dimension and talking to
members of civilization long dead? Or, for that matter, could you imagine the
effect that proof of the spirit world would have upon the science of warfare? I
think it would make it virtually obsolete.
If we knew that there was a spirit world in which love and
knowledge were the only attributes of importance and the things that wars are
fought for (money, land, political power and many but few to mention) were
important only here on earth, it would certainly change our attitudes and
beliefs about the people we consider enemies.
It would make us look at this people in a new light. After
all, existence of a spirit world would mean that we would be destined to spend
eternity with these people. It will also mean that in our life aft life, we
would be able to know exactly how they felt about life on earth and about us.
Just knowing that such a realm exists would surely make us more tolerant of
each other.
Scientist are still finding
it difficult to prove the concept of life
after death as no enough real data has been provided yet for further
research but just anecdotal evidence. It has not been possible to
scientifically duplicate them or study them on a closer level than what we could
call ”word of mouth”. Until the phenomenon can be duplicated, science can’t
accept this but the existence of something that happens to people who almost
die
No comments: